Home › AI Benchmark › GPT-4o mini
OpenAI released on Jul 18, 2024 API access

GPT-4o mini

GPT-4o mini (OpenAI) was released on Jul 18, 2024. In the Epoch AI capability ranking (ECI), it ranks #176 out of 267 models, with 126.58. Against models of the same generation, its best result is on GSM8K: 91.3%, #1 of 27.

#176 of 267 in the ECI ranking
126.58 ECI, the Epoch AI capability index
no match Arena ELO, human preference
not measured LiveBench, overall average from 0 to 100
No votes yet. Rate it.
What the tests say

Where GPT-4o mini stands out and where it falls behind, by the numbers

GPT-4o mini has published results on 23 tests compiled by Epoch AI. The yardstick here is its generation: its position among the models released between Oct 22, 2023 and Oct 16, 2024 that took the same test. Against the whole archive, which includes 2023 models, a recent release lands near the top of almost everything, and that says nothing.

Where it stands out

Tests where it sits in the top third of its own generation.

GSM8K91.3%
#1 of 27 in its generation · #2 of 54 overall
PIQA88.7%
#1 of 13 in its generation · #1 of 43 overall
BoolQ88.7%
#1 of 9 in its generation · #4 of 42 overall
MMLU81.8%
#7 of 52 in its generation · #13 of 92 overall
MATH level 552.6%
#7 of 31 in its generation · #41 of 73 overall

Where it falls behind

Tests where it sits in the bottom half of its own generation.

SimpleBench10.7%
#8 of 8 in its generation · record: 81.9% (Claude Fable 5)
BALROG17.4%
#6 of 11 in its generation · record: 68.3% (GPT-6 Astra)
WeirdML11.8%
#9 of 17 in its generation · record: 93.6% (GPT-6 Astra)
See all 23 tests, one by one
TestScoreIn its generationOverallTest record
GPQA Diamond 37.7% #16 / 34 #151 / 173 96.4% Gemini 4 Argon
AIME 2024 and 2025 (OTIS) 6.9% #7 / 27 #141 / 168 100.0% GPT-5.5
Dtbench 54.4% #11 / 26 #125 / 148 98.9% Claude Opus 5.5
Lmca 10.37 #5 / 13 #108 / 121 68.23 Claude Opus 5.5
WeirdML 11.8% #9 / 17 #104 / 112 93.6% GPT-6 Astra
MMLU 81.8% #7 / 52 #13 / 92 88.1% GPT-4o (May 2024)
Frontiermath Tiers 1 3 V2 0.7% #1 / 4 (tied with 1) #83 / 86 93.7% GPT-6 Astra
ARC-AGI 2 0.0% #3 / 4 (tied with 1) #76 / 83 95.0% GPT-6 Astra
SimpleQA Verified 8.3% #3 / 3 #80 / 81 76.0% Gemini 4 Argon
Chess puzzles 3.0% #2 / 3 (tied with 1) #76 / 80 76.0% GPT-6 Astra
Game puzzles 12.0% #1 / 2 #58 / 77 84.0% GPT-6 Astra
SimpleBench 10.7% #8 / 8 #74 / 74 81.9% Claude Fable 5
MATH level 5 52.6% #7 / 31 #41 / 73 98.1% GPT-5
GSM8K 91.3% #1 / 27 #2 / 54 92.0% GPT-4 (Mar 2023)
PIQA 88.7% #1 / 13 #1 / 43 88.7% GPT-4o mini
BoolQ 88.7% #1 / 9 #4 / 42 90.9% PaLM 2-L
Aider Polyglot 3.60 #3 / 3 #38 / 38 88.00 GPT-5
Creative writing (Lech Mazur) 6.72 #2 / 3 #32 / 38 8.60 GPT-5
BALROG 17.4% #6 / 11 #26 / 32 68.3% GPT-6 Astra
LiveBench 41.26 #4 / 9 #27 / 32 82.35 Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025)
GeoBench 3,401 #4 / 5 #16 / 24 4,333 Gemini 3 Flash
VPCT 34.0% #2 / 2 #20 / 22 91.0% Gemini 3 Pro
Video Mme 64.8% #5 / 5 #5 / 6 75.0% Gemini 1.5 Pro (Sept 2024)

For each test, the model's best effort level counts, as in the ranking. Source of the scores: Epoch AI, under CC BY 4.0.

Comparison

What to compare GPT-4o mini with

The models from other labs closest in capability and released in the same period, at most two per lab. Click any of them to see its page.

ModelLabECIELOLiveBenchRelease
Mistral Small 3.1 Mistral AI 127.49 n/a n/a Mar 17, 2025
Llama 3.3 70B Meta AI 127.34 n/a n/a Dec 6, 2024
Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic 127.17 1,286 n/a Oct 22, 2024
Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI 127.08 n/a n/a Jan 30, 2025
Claude 3 Opus Anthropic 126.91 1,264 n/a Feb 29, 2024
GPT-4o mini OpenAI 126.58 n/a n/a Jul 18, 2024
Llama 3.1-70B Meta AI 125.94 n/a n/a Jul 23, 2024
Head to head

GPT-4o mini or Claude 3 Opus?

Claude 3 Opus is the model from another lab closest to GPT-4o mini in capability. Across the 11 tests both took, this is the score:

GPT-4o mini ahead on 2 Claude 3 Opus ahead on 8 tied on 1
Largest differences first
TestGPT-4o miniClaude 3 Opus
SimpleBench 10.7% 23.5%
Lmca 10.37 17.00
WeirdML 11.8% 19.2%
SimpleQA Verified 8.3% 12.6%
AIME 2024 and 2025 (OTIS) 6.9% 4.7%
MATH level 5 52.6% 37.5%
GPQA Diamond 37.7% 47.2%
LiveBench 41.26 49.16
Dtbench 54.4% 61.6%
MMLU 81.8% 84.6%

Unweighted score: each test counts one point, whether math or coding. The dot marks who did better on each row.

Family

Other models from OpenAI

The models from the same lab closest in time, newest first.

ModelReleaseECIELOLiveBenchAccess
GPT-4.1 Apr 14, 2025 136.77 n/a n/a API access
GPT-4.5 Feb 27, 2025 136.73 n/a n/a API access
o3-mini Jan 31, 2025 140.33 1,379 n/a API access
o1 Dec 17, 2024 141.84 1,383 n/a API access
o1-mini Sep 12, 2024 135.82 1,362 n/a API access
GPT-4o mini Jul 18, 2024 126.58 n/a n/a API access
GPT-4o (May 2024) May 13, 2024 129.05 n/a n/a API access
GPT-4 Turbo (Apr 2024) Apr 9, 2024 127.25 n/a n/a API access
GPT-3.5 Turbo (Nov 2023) Nov 6, 2023 118.58 n/a n/a API access
Your rating

Have you used GPT-4o mini? Rate it

n/a out of 5
no votes yet

Users' opinion, not measurement: the rating is kept apart from the ranking and does not move anyone's position. One vote per browser, no sign-up, and you can change your rating later.

Tap a star to vote.
Frequently asked questions

What people ask about GPT-4o mini

Where does GPT-4o mini rank among AI models?

In the ROO3 AI Benchmark, ordered by the Epoch AI ECI, GPT-4o mini ranks #176 out of 267 models, with an ECI of 126.58. The ECI is a composite index that combines several hard benchmarks into a single scale. The position changes when a new model comes out, and the page is refreshed six times a day.

Is GPT-4o mini better than Claude 3 Opus?

Across the 11 tests both models took and Epoch AI compiled, GPT-4o mini comes out ahead on 2, behind on 8 and tied on 1. It is a test-by-test count with no weighting: a win in math counts the same as a win in coding. To choose between the two, look at the tests that resemble your own use.

What is GPT-4o mini best at?

Against models of the same generation (released up to 9 months before and up to 3 months after it), the best relative results of GPT-4o mini are: GSM8K (#1 of 27); PIQA (#1 of 13); BoolQ (#1 of 9). The yardstick is its position among the models of that period that took the same test.

Where do the numbers on this page come from?

From the same three sources as the ranking, all openly licensed: Epoch AI (ECI and individual tests, CC BY 4.0), Arena (human-preference ELO, CC BY 4.0) and LiveBench (overall average, CC BY-SA 4.0). ROO3 does not measure any model. When the page shows a figure published by the maker itself, it appears in the written analysis, labeled as the maker's, and never enters the ranking.

Sources

Where each number comes from

Epoch AI, "AI Benchmarking Hub". Published at epoch.ai. Data under the CC BY 4.0 licence, reordered by roo3.co.

The Arena (LMArena) leaderboard, from the public lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset on Hugging Face, under the CC BY 4.0 licence. We are not affiliated with the Arena.

LiveBench, by the LiveBench team, published at livebench.ai under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license. The overall average is recomputed by roo3.co with the same formula as the website (average of the categories), and those numbers stay under CC BY-SA 4.0. We are not affiliated with LiveBench.

← See the full ranking