Home › AI Benchmark › o3-mini
OpenAI released on Jan 31, 2025 API access

o3-mini

o3-mini (OpenAI) was released on Jan 31, 2025. In the Epoch AI capability ranking (ECI), it ranks #121 out of 267 models, with 140.33. On Arena, which measures human preference in blind comparisons, it has 1,379 ELO points (#198). Against models of the same generation, its best result is on SciCode: 42.8%, #1 of 15.

#121 of 267 in the ECI ranking
140.33 ECI, the Epoch AI capability index
1,379 Arena ELO, human preference · #198
not measured LiveBench, overall average from 0 to 100
No votes yet. Rate it.
What the tests say

Where o3-mini stands out and where it falls behind, by the numbers

o3-mini has published results on 25 tests compiled by Epoch AI. The yardstick here is its generation: its position among the models released between May 6, 2024 and May 1, 2025 that took the same test. Against the whole archive, which includes 2023 models, a recent release lands near the top of almost everything, and that says nothing.

Where it stands out

Tests where it sits in the top third of its own generation.

SciCode42.8%
#1 of 15 in its generation · #70 of 104 overall
Cybench22.5%
#1 of 8 in its generation · #9 of 19 overall
LiveBench75.88
#2 of 26 in its generation · #4 of 32 overall
AIME 2024 and 2025 (OTIS)76.9%
#3 of 48 in its generation · #89 of 168 overall
MATH level 596.5%
#3 of 43 in its generation · #8 of 73 overall

Where it falls behind

Tests where it sits in the bottom half of its own generation.

Creative writing (Lech Mazur)6.17
#21 of 22 in its generation · record: 8.60 (GPT-5)
Gso1.3%
#5 of 6 in its generation · record: 88.2% (Claude Fable 5.1)
Fiction.liveBench43.8%
#10 of 14 in its generation · record: 100.0% (o3)
SimpleBench22.8%
#14 of 21 in its generation · record: 81.9% (Claude Fable 5)
SimpleQA Verified15.3%
#6 of 9 in its generation · record: 76.0% (Gemini 4 Argon)
See all 25 tests, one by one
TestScoreIn its generationOverallTest record
GPQA Diamond 77.0% #4 / 52 #90 / 173 96.4% Gemini 4 Argon
AIME 2024 and 2025 (OTIS) 76.9% #3 / 48 #89 / 168 100.0% GPT-5.5
Dtbench 68.8% #4 / 37 (tied with 1) #91 / 148 98.9% Claude Opus 5.5
Lmca 18.97 #6 / 26 #93 / 121 68.23 Claude Opus 5.5
CritPt 0.3% #3 / 18 (tied with 1) #84 / 112 32.3% GPT-5.6 Sol
WeirdML 43.7% #4 / 26 #63 / 112 93.6% GPT-6 Astra
SciCode 42.8% #1 / 15 #70 / 104 66.9% Claude Opus 5.5
Frontiermath Tiers 1 3 V2 18.6% #3 / 8 #76 / 86 93.7% GPT-6 Astra
ARC-AGI 2 3.0% #3 / 16 #64 / 83 95.0% GPT-6 Astra
ARC-AGI 34.5% #3 / 14 #64 / 81 98.5% Claude Fable 5
SimpleQA Verified 15.3% #6 / 9 #73 / 81 76.0% Gemini 4 Argon
Chess puzzles 15.0% #3 / 9 #64 / 80 76.0% GPT-6 Astra
Game puzzles 7.0% #3 / 5 (tied with 1) #69 / 77 84.0% GPT-6 Astra
SimpleBench 22.8% #14 / 21 #66 / 74 81.9% Claude Fable 5
MATH level 5 96.5% #3 / 43 #8 / 73 98.1% GPT-5
Frontiermath Tier 4 V2 0.0% #2 / 2 #65 / 67 100.0% GPT-6.1 Sol
FrontierMath 12.4% #3 / 21 #35 / 65 51.7% GPT-5.5
FrontierMath tier 4 4.2% #2 / 6 #23 / 48 39.6% GPT-5.5 Pro
Aider Polyglot 60.40 #4 / 23 (tied with 1) #13 / 38 88.00 GPT-5
Creative writing (Lech Mazur) 6.17 #21 / 22 #37 / 38 8.60 GPT-5
LiveBench 75.88 #2 / 26 #4 / 32 82.35 Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025)
Fiction.liveBench 43.8% #10 / 14 #22 / 31 100.0% o3
Gso 1.3% #5 / 6 #27 / 28 88.2% Claude Fable 5.1
Cybench 22.5% #1 / 8 #9 / 19 93.0% Claude Opus 4.6
CAD-Eval 54.0% #4 / 12 (tied with 1) #5 / 14 74.0% o3

For each test, the model's best effort level counts, as in the ranking. Source of the scores: Epoch AI, under CC BY 4.0.

Comparison

What to compare o3-mini with

The models from other labs closest in capability and released in the same period, at most two per lab. Click any of them to see its page.

ModelLabECIELOLiveBenchRelease
Claude 3.7 Sonnet Anthropic 141.14 1,360 n/a Feb 24, 2025
GLM-4.6 Z.ai (Zhipu AI) 140.78 1,500 n/a Sep 30, 2025
Grok-3 mini xAI 140.33 1,394 n/a Jun 24, 2025
o3-mini OpenAI 140.33 1,379 n/a Jan 31, 2025
Kimi K2 Instruct Moonshot 140.13 n/a n/a Jul 12, 2025
DeepSeek-V3.1 DeepSeek 139.91 1,469 n/a Aug 21, 2025
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking (Jul 2025) Alibaba 139.61 1,347 n/a Jul 30, 2025
Head to head

o3-mini or Grok-3 mini?

Grok-3 mini is the model from another lab closest to o3-mini in capability. Across the 10 tests both took, this is the score:

o3-mini ahead on 7 Grok-3 mini ahead on 3
Largest differences first
Testo3-miniGrok-3 mini
ARC-AGI 2 3.0% 0.4%
FrontierMath 12.4% 5.9%
ARC-AGI 34.5% 16.5%
Fiction.liveBench 43.8% 65.6%
Aider Polyglot 60.40 49.30
Creative writing (Lech Mazur) 6.17 7.35
MATH level 5 96.5% 90.9%
WeirdML 43.7% 42.6%
AIME 2024 and 2025 (OTIS) 76.9% 77.8%
GPQA Diamond 77.0% 76.3%

Unweighted score: each test counts one point, whether math or coding. The dot marks who did better on each row.

Cost per task

What o3-mini costs to deliver each task

Price per token is what is on the price sheet; cost per task is what lands on the invoice, because it depends on how many tokens the model spends. Each point is an effort level, published by whoever ran the test and compiled by Epoch AI. The further up and to the left, the more score per dollar.

ARC-AGI 2

The score scale does not start at zero.

0%1%2%3%3%US$ 0.10US$ 0.20US$ 0.50cost per task (log scale)o3-mini · low · 0.0% · US$ 0.06lowo3-mini · medium · 2.1% · US$ 0.28mediumo3-mini · high · 3.0% · US$ 0.55highClaude 3.7 Sonnet · · 0.0% · US$ 0.12Claude 3.7 Sonnet · · 0.9% · US$ 0.36Claude 3.7 Sonnet · · 0.7% · US$ 0.51
o3-miniClaude 3.7 Sonnet

ARC-AGI

The score scale does not start at zero.

10%17%24%31%38%US$ 0.05US$ 0.17US$ 0.28US$ 0.40cost per tasko3-mini · low · 14.5% · US$ 0.05lowo3-mini · medium · 22.3% · US$ 0.19mediumo3-mini · high · 34.5% · US$ 0.40highClaude 3.7 Sonnet · · 13.6% · US$ 0.06Claude 3.7 Sonnet · · 21.2% · US$ 0.21Claude 3.7 Sonnet · · 28.6% · US$ 0.33
o3-miniClaude 3.7 Sonnet
Family

Other models from OpenAI

The models from the same lab closest in time, newest first.

ModelReleaseECIELOLiveBenchAccess
o3-pro Jun 10, 2025 147.37 n/a n/a API access
o3 Apr 16, 2025 146.87 n/a n/a API access
o4-mini Apr 16, 2025 145.60 n/a n/a API access
GPT-4.1 Apr 14, 2025 136.77 n/a n/a API access
GPT-4.1 mini Apr 14, 2025 135.00 n/a n/a API access
GPT-4.1 nano Apr 14, 2025 129.63 n/a n/a API access
GPT-4.5 Feb 27, 2025 136.73 n/a n/a API access
o3-mini Jan 31, 2025 140.33 1,379 n/a API access
o1 Dec 17, 2024 141.84 1,383 n/a API access
Your rating

Have you used o3-mini? Rate it

n/a out of 5
no votes yet

Users' opinion, not measurement: the rating is kept apart from the ranking and does not move anyone's position. One vote per browser, no sign-up, and you can change your rating later.

Tap a star to vote.
Frequently asked questions

What people ask about o3-mini

Where does o3-mini rank among AI models?

In the ROO3 AI Benchmark, ordered by the Epoch AI ECI, o3-mini ranks #121 out of 267 models, with an ECI of 140.33. The ECI is a composite index that combines several hard benchmarks into a single scale. The position changes when a new model comes out, and the page is refreshed six times a day.

Is o3-mini better than Grok-3 mini?

Across the 10 tests both models took and Epoch AI compiled, o3-mini comes out ahead on 7, behind on 3 and tied on 0. It is a test-by-test count with no weighting: a win in math counts the same as a win in coding. To choose between the two, look at the tests that resemble your own use.

What is o3-mini best at?

Against models of the same generation (released up to 9 months before and up to 3 months after it), the best relative results of o3-mini are: SciCode (#1 of 15); Cybench (#1 of 8); LiveBench (#2 of 26). The yardstick is its position among the models of that period that took the same test.

Where do the numbers on this page come from?

From the same three sources as the ranking, all openly licensed: Epoch AI (ECI and individual tests, CC BY 4.0), Arena (human-preference ELO, CC BY 4.0) and LiveBench (overall average, CC BY-SA 4.0). ROO3 does not measure any model. When the page shows a figure published by the maker itself, it appears in the written analysis, labeled as the maker's, and never enters the ranking.

Sources

Where each number comes from

Epoch AI, "AI Benchmarking Hub". Published at epoch.ai. Data under the CC BY 4.0 licence, reordered by roo3.co.

The Arena (LMArena) leaderboard, from the public lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset on Hugging Face, under the CC BY 4.0 licence. We are not affiliated with the Arena.

LiveBench, by the LiveBench team, published at livebench.ai under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license. The overall average is recomputed by roo3.co with the same formula as the website (average of the categories), and those numbers stay under CC BY-SA 4.0. We are not affiliated with LiveBench.

← See the full ranking