Home › AI Benchmark › Qwen2.5-Coder-14B
lab not stated released on Sep 18, 2024 Unknown

Qwen2.5-Coder-14B

Qwen2.5-Coder-14B (lab not stated) was released on Sep 18, 2024. In the Epoch AI capability ranking (ECI), it ranks #209 out of 267 models, with 116.44. Against models of the same generation, its best result is on GSM8K: 88.7%, #3 of 20.

#209 of 267 in the ECI ranking
116.44 ECI, the Epoch AI capability index
no match Arena ELO, human preference
not measured LiveBench, overall average from 0 to 100
No votes yet. Rate it.
What the tests say

Where Qwen2.5-Coder-14B stands out and where it falls behind, by the numbers

Qwen2.5-Coder-14B has published results on 5 tests compiled by Epoch AI. The yardstick here is its generation: its position among the models released between Dec 23, 2023 and Dec 17, 2024 that took the same test. Against the whole archive, which includes 2023 models, a recent release lands near the top of almost everything, and that says nothing.

Where it stands out

Tests where it sits in the top third of its own generation.

GSM8K88.7%
#3 of 20 in its generation · #4 of 54 overall

Where it falls behind

Tests where it sits in the bottom half of its own generation.

MMLU75.2%
#25 of 48 in its generation · record: 88.1% (GPT-4o (May 2024))
HellaSwag80.2%
#9 of 17 in its generation · record: 95.3% (GPT-4 (Mar 2023))
See all 5 tests, one by one
TestScoreIn its generationOverallTest record
MMLU 75.2% #25 / 48 #30 / 92 88.1% GPT-4o (May 2024)
ARC (AI2) 66.0% #10 / 22 #26 / 65 95.3% DeepSeek-V3 (Mar 2025)
WinoGrande 76.8% #12 / 27 #23 / 61 89.2% Llama 3.1-405B
GSM8K 88.7% #3 / 20 #4 / 54 92.0% GPT-4 (Mar 2023)
HellaSwag 80.2% #9 / 17 #23 / 51 95.3% GPT-4 (Mar 2023)

For each test, the model's best effort level counts, as in the ranking. Source of the scores: Epoch AI, under CC BY 4.0.

Comparison

What to compare Qwen2.5-Coder-14B with

The models from other labs closest in capability and released in the same period, at most two per lab. Click any of them to see its page.

ModelLabECIELOLiveBenchRelease
Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic 118.39 1,206 n/a Mar 7, 2024
Ministral 3B Mistral AI 118.12 n/a n/a Oct 16, 2024
phi-3-mini 3.8B Microsoft 117.40 n/a n/a Apr 23, 2024
Llama 3.1-8B Meta AI 116.61 n/a n/a Jul 23, 2024
Llama 3-8B Meta AI 116.49 n/a n/a Apr 18, 2024
Qwen2.5-Coder-14B 116.44 n/a n/a Sep 18, 2024
Gemma 3 4B Google DeepMind 116.01 n/a n/a Mar 12, 2025
Your rating

Have you used Qwen2.5-Coder-14B? Rate it

n/a out of 5
no votes yet

Users' opinion, not measurement: the rating is kept apart from the ranking and does not move anyone's position. One vote per browser, no sign-up, and you can change your rating later.

Tap a star to vote.
Frequently asked questions

What people ask about Qwen2.5-Coder-14B

Where does Qwen2.5-Coder-14B rank among AI models?

In the ROO3 AI Benchmark, ordered by the Epoch AI ECI, Qwen2.5-Coder-14B ranks #209 out of 267 models, with an ECI of 116.44. The ECI is a composite index that combines several hard benchmarks into a single scale. The position changes when a new model comes out, and the page is refreshed six times a day.

What is Qwen2.5-Coder-14B best at?

Against models of the same generation (released up to 9 months before and up to 3 months after it), the best relative results of Qwen2.5-Coder-14B are: GSM8K (#3 of 20). The yardstick is its position among the models of that period that took the same test.

Where do the numbers on this page come from?

From the same three sources as the ranking, all openly licensed: Epoch AI (ECI and individual tests, CC BY 4.0), Arena (human-preference ELO, CC BY 4.0) and LiveBench (overall average, CC BY-SA 4.0). ROO3 does not measure any model. When the page shows a figure published by the maker itself, it appears in the written analysis, labeled as the maker's, and never enters the ranking.

Sources

Where each number comes from

Epoch AI, "AI Benchmarking Hub". Published at epoch.ai. Data under the CC BY 4.0 licence, reordered by roo3.co.

The Arena (LMArena) leaderboard, from the public lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset on Hugging Face, under the CC BY 4.0 licence. We are not affiliated with the Arena.

LiveBench, by the LiveBench team, published at livebench.ai under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license. The overall average is recomputed by roo3.co with the same formula as the website (average of the categories), and those numbers stay under CC BY-SA 4.0. We are not affiliated with LiveBench.

← See the full ranking