Muse Spark 1.2
Muse Spark 1.2 (Meta AI) was released on Aug 5, 2026. In the Epoch AI capability ranking (ECI), it ranks #34 out of 267 models, with 154.90. On Arena, which measures human preference in blind comparisons, it has 1,509 ELO points (#42). On LiveBench, the overall average is 78.0, #17 out of 58 scored models. Against models of the same generation, its best result is on SimpleBench: 74.5%, #8 of 37.
Where Muse Spark 1.2 stands out and where it falls behind, by the numbers
Muse Spark 1.2 has published results on 14 tests compiled by Epoch AI. The yardstick here is its generation: its position among the models released between Nov 8, 2025 and Nov 3, 2026 that took the same test. Against the whole archive, which includes 2023 models, a recent release lands near the top of almost everything, and that says nothing.
Where it stands out
Tests where it sits in the top third of its own generation.
Where it falls behind
Tests where it sits in the bottom half of its own generation.
See all 14 tests, one by one
| Test | Score | In its generation | Overall | Test record |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dtbench | 94.7% | #19 / 69 (tied with 1) | #19 / 148 | 98.9% Claude Opus 5.5 |
| Lmca | 48.35 | #26 / 69 | #26 / 121 | 68.23 Claude Opus 5.5 |
| CritPt | 17.7% | #32 / 79 (tied with 1) | #32 / 112 | 32.3% GPT-5.6 Sol |
| WeirdML | 60.3% | #30 / 53 (tied with 1) | #32 / 112 | 93.6% GPT-6 Astra |
| SciCode | 57.4% | #18 / 76 | #18 / 104 | 66.9% Claude Opus 5.5 |
| WebDev Arena | 1,534 | #34 / 74 | #34 / 82 | 1,820 Claude Opus 5.5 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 60.3% | #16 / 64 | #16 / 81 | 76.0% Gemini 4 Argon |
| Chess puzzles | 27.0% | #44 / 64 | #47 / 80 | 76.0% GPT-6 Astra |
| ProofBench | 43.0% | #35 / 70 | #35 / 74 | 100.0% Claude Fable 5.1 |
| SimpleBench | 74.5% | #8 / 37 | #8 / 74 | 81.9% Claude Fable 5 |
| Apex Agents | 36.4% | #41 / 49 | #41 / 50 | 82.4% Gemini 4 Argon |
| Gdp Pdf | 16.0% | #28 / 37 | #28 / 37 | 35.0% GPT-6.1 Sol |
| DeepSWE | 54.9% | #16 / 26 | #16 / 26 | 74.1% GPT-6 Astra |
| FrontierSWE | 12.0% | #19 / 20 | #19 / 20 | 65.5% GPT-6 Astra |
For each test, the model's best effort level counts, as in the ranking. Source of the scores: Epoch AI, under CC BY 4.0.
What to compare Muse Spark 1.2 with
The models from other labs closest in capability and released in the same period, at most two per lab. Click any of them to see its page.
| Model | Lab | ECI | ELO | LiveBench | Release |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | DeepSeek | 155.29 | n/a | 77.4 | Aug 13, 2026 |
| Claude Opus 4.6 | Anthropic | 155.27 | 1,550 | 74.5 | Feb 5, 2026 |
| Muse Spark 1.2 | Meta AI | 154.90 | 1,509 | 78.0 | Aug 5, 2026 |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro | Google DeepMind | 154.67 | 1,528 | 77.0 | Feb 19, 2026 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 | DeepSeek | 154.49 | n/a | 74.2 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | Google DeepMind | 154.38 | 1,526 | 74.6 | May 19, 2026 |
| Grok 4.7 | xAI | 154.37 | 1,453 | 77.4 | Sep 21, 2026 |
Muse Spark 1.2 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Gemini 3.1 Pro is the model from another lab closest to Muse Spark 1.2 in capability. Across the 13 tests both took, this is the score:
| Test | Muse Spark 1.2 | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 54.9% | 11.7% |
| Chess puzzles | 27.0% | 51.0% |
| ProofBench | 43.0% | 26.0% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 60.3% | 73.5% |
| WeirdML | 60.3% | 72.1% |
| Lmca | 48.35 | 53.82 |
| SimpleBench | 74.5% | 79.6% |
| Gdp Pdf | 16.0% | 17.0% |
| WebDev Arena | 1,534 | 1,447 |
| Apex Agents | 36.4% | 35.3% |
Unweighted score: each test counts one point, whether math or coding. The dot marks who did better on each row.
Other models from Meta AI
The models from the same lab closest in time, newest first.
| Model | Release | ECI | ELO | LiveBench | Access |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muse Spark Open | Oct 15, 2026 | no ECI | n/a | n/a | Open weights (restricted use) |
| Muse Wonder | Oct 12, 2026 | no ECI | 1,540 | n/a | API access |
| Muse Spark 1.3 | Sep 2, 2026 | 156.76 | 1,528 | 81.6 | API access |
| Muse Spark 1.2 | Aug 5, 2026 | 154.90 | 1,509 | 78.0 | API access |
| Muse Spark 1.1 | Jul 9, 2026 | 154.00 | 1,516 | 75.3 | API access |
| Muse Spark | Apr 8, 2026 | 152.13 | 1,508 | n/a | API access |
| Llama 4 Maverick | Apr 6, 2025 | 132.20 | n/a | n/a | Open weights (restricted use) |
| Llama 4 Scout | Apr 5, 2025 | 129.65 | n/a | n/a | Open weights (restricted use) |
| Llama 3.3 70B | Dec 6, 2024 | 127.34 | n/a | n/a | Open weights (restricted use) |
Have you used Muse Spark 1.2? Rate it
Users' opinion, not measurement: the rating is kept apart from the ranking and does not move anyone's position. One vote per browser, no sign-up, and you can change your rating later.
What people ask about Muse Spark 1.2
Where does Muse Spark 1.2 rank among AI models?
In the ROO3 AI Benchmark, ordered by the Epoch AI ECI, Muse Spark 1.2 ranks #34 out of 267 models, with an ECI of 154.90. The ECI is a composite index that combines several hard benchmarks into a single scale. The position changes when a new model comes out, and the page is refreshed six times a day.
Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Across the 13 tests both models took and Epoch AI compiled, Muse Spark 1.2 comes out ahead on 4, behind on 8 and tied on 1. It is a test-by-test count with no weighting: a win in math counts the same as a win in coding. To choose between the two, look at the tests that resemble your own use.
What is Muse Spark 1.2 best at?
Against models of the same generation (released up to 9 months before and up to 3 months after it), the best relative results of Muse Spark 1.2 are: SimpleBench (#8 of 37); SciCode (#18 of 76); SimpleQA Verified (#16 of 64). The yardstick is its position among the models of that period that took the same test.
Where do the numbers on this page come from?
From the same three sources as the ranking, all openly licensed: Epoch AI (ECI and individual tests, CC BY 4.0), Arena (human-preference ELO, CC BY 4.0) and LiveBench (overall average, CC BY-SA 4.0). ROO3 does not measure any model. When the page shows a figure published by the maker itself, it appears in the written analysis, labeled as the maker's, and never enters the ranking.
Where each number comes from
Epoch AI, "AI Benchmarking Hub". Published at epoch.ai. Data under the CC BY 4.0 licence, reordered by roo3.co.
The Arena (LMArena) leaderboard, from the public lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset on Hugging Face, under the CC BY 4.0 licence. We are not affiliated with the Arena.
LiveBench, by the LiveBench team, published at livebench.ai under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license. The overall average is recomputed by roo3.co with the same formula as the website (average of the categories), and those numbers stay under CC BY-SA 4.0. We are not affiliated with LiveBench.
← See the full ranking